Research library

The literature, read properly

Peptides are one of the most active areas in biology, and one of the worst-served by the writing about them. These articles do the unglamorous version: what investigators actually studied, in which system, and what they measured.

Every finding here names its model — cell line, rodent, or which human population in which trial. Every reference links out to the paper. Where the evidence is thin, inconsistent or negative, the article says so, because a catalog that only cites its good results is not worth reading.

Articles
13
Cited sources
30
Dosing guides
0

Start here

By research world

The library is organised the same way the catalog is — by the question being asked rather than by the class of molecule.

All articles

Supplies

Handling lyophilised peptides at the bench

Freeze-drying buys stability and introduces its own failure modes. Most degradation in practice happens before an experiment starts.

September 25, 20267 min read

Cellular

Thymic peptides: an immunomodulator with a long paper trail

Thymosin alpha-1 has been studied since the 1970s, is licensed in a number of countries, and has a mechanistic account centred on Toll-like receptor signalling.

September 24, 20267 min read

Endocrine

Upstream of GnRH: kisspeptin, and the oxytocin comparison

Kisspeptin sits above the classical reproductive axis and was identified through a human genetic disorder. Oxytocin is the opposite case — long known, recently complicated.

September 23, 20267 min read

Specialty

The melanocortin receptors, and a cautionary case

Five receptors, one peptide family, and two compounds whose human records could hardly be more different. One has a phase 3 programme; the other has regulatory warnings.

September 20, 20268 min read

Metabolic

Amylin, a growth-hormone fragment, and two different evidence levels

Cagrilintide has a published phase 2 trial in humans. AOD-9604 has mouse work and a failed clinical programme. Both sit in the same catalog world.

September 16, 20268 min read

Neurobiology

Neuropeptides: ACTH fragments, a sleep factor, and VIP

Three research lines with very different provenance — Soviet-era clinical pharmacology, a 1977 isolation that never fully resolved, and a well-characterised receptor system.

September 9, 20269 min read

Cellular

Mitochondrial peptides, cardiolipin and the NAD+ pool

The mitochondrial genome encodes signalling peptides of its own. Separately, a class of compounds targets the inner membrane directly.

September 2, 202610 min read

Regenerative

PepT1, and a three-residue fragment of a larger hormone

KPV is the C-terminal tripeptide of alpha-MSH. The interesting part of its literature is how it gets into a cell.

August 26, 20266 min read

Endocrine

The growth-hormone axis, and four ways to poke it

GHRH analogues and ghrelin-receptor secretagogues act on different receptors with different consequences for pulsatility. The distinction is the whole subject.

August 19, 202610 min read

Regenerative

Tissue repair: actin, vessels and animal wound models

Two of the most requested research peptides sit on entirely different mechanistic evidence. Reading them side by side is instructive.

August 11, 20269 min read

Regenerative

Matrikines: what the skin matrix says to itself

Collagen breakdown products act as signals, not just debris. The literature on GHK and copper coordination is the clearest worked example.

August 4, 20268 min read

Supplies

How to read a certificate of analysis

What HPLC purity, mass-spectrometric identity, water content and endotoxin figures each tell you — and the several things a COA cannot tell you at all.

July 22, 20268 min read

Cellular

What a peptide actually is

Short chains of amino acids, the signalling vocabulary biology already speaks, and why they became one of the most active areas in drug discovery.

July 14, 20267 min read

How to read this library

Nothing here is about people. Every statement is a statement about a study — its system, its endpoint, its result. None of it describes what a compound would do in a person, and none of it is medical advice.

No dosing, anywhere. Not in an article, not on a compound page, not on request. Protocol design belongs to the investigator running the work.

Negative results are included. A compound whose clinical programme failed, or whose mechanism is unresolved after fifty years, is written up that way. See the metabolic article and the neuropeptide article.